On the Probable CGI Launch of Front Man Elon Musk’s Falcon Heavy “Rocket”

Copyright 2018 Anonymous Physicist. All Rights Reserved

Last week, on Feb. 6th Elon Musk’s SpaceX allegedly launched what is being proclaimed to now be the world’s largest rocket.

My analysis indicates that the “launch” was likely CGI. First the launch date had been scheduled for Feb. 8th. Many launches are delayed, but I don’t recall any that were launched prior to the scheduled date. Then frontman Musk said that there was a fair chance that the rocket would malfunction due to its 27 engines and complexity. I’ve rarely seen such a statement prior to launch either. I believe that he only said that because he knew it would not fail. Given its complexity and possible Quarantiner action, the only way he could know for certain that it would not fail, is that the “launch” is CGI.

One second after “launch” the engineers in the control room immediately all start loudly cheering and carrying on. This despite that fact that it could explode at any time. I can tell you that engineers don’t act like that. During the fake Apollo missions and earlier possibly genuine NASA missions, engineers only clapped after splashdown and mission completion.

Later video was released of a nearby Elon Musk watching the successful launch on TV.

It shows him quickly running outside as several people are “watching” the launch. He stands near a man who is pointing up and he then also points upward at the “rocket.” Now if the launch just occurred and is nearby, it would be very bright and would fill a good sized solid angle in the sky. No one would need to point. No one would have pointed just as you don’t see pointing during NASA’s Apollo or Shuttle launches which had many people in nearby grandstands. But here’s the kicker: the cameraperson never pans away from Musk toward the alleged rocket in the sky! Note that the camera person followed him outside the house, etc

Then at a subsequent press conference, Musk apparently replies to a reporter, “you can tell it’s real because it looks so fake. Honestly. We have way better CGI.” You can’t make this up. Paraphrasing him: It’s real because it looks fake and since we have better fakery, again it must be real. See: 

Another factor is the alleged successful return of the two booster rockets via reverse thrusting. Until just a few years ago, all such attempts by NASA and private companies, for decades, had 100% failure. Now they have nearly 100% success. Sure.

We also had the absurdity of Musk having his Tesla car as payload with a Starman dummy as “driver” and accompanied by ridiculous music and video of the car in black space.

It’s also sickening that anyone buys the obvious intel agency front called the “flat earth” movement. The earth is round, and that fake movement is akin to the 9/11 fake conspiracy hangouts that I alone proved were fake: DEW and thermite. The flat earth nonsense apparently is being brought out in conjunction with these CGI “launches” so that they will be portrayed as coupled and so reasonable people will say that since the one [flat earth] meme is absurd, the other, CGI “launches,” isn’t true either.

The conclusion of this Anonymous Physicist is that it’s highly likely that the Falcon Heavy “launch” was merely CGI. As I’ve written, NASA was shut down by the Quarantiners who aren’t fooled by “private enterprise” launches either. The secret societies/intel agencies make billionaires out of corrupt people who then are tasked to be front men or women in nefarious PsyOps. Laughably Musk is planning human launches soon and “trips to Mars.” The Quarantiners and this Anonymous Physicist are having a good laugh at this.

Please order my 4 remarkable books, if you are a human being, and not an intel agent. Contact me via Michaelrings13@yahoo.com We will provide a secure paypal account.